|
|
|
|
|
More Indo-Fijians live below poverty line
21/07/2008 |
More Indo Fijians are living below the poverty line (37 per cent) compared to Fijians (34 per cent).
This was one of the findings (incidence of poverty) highlighted in the book, the Quantitative Analysis of Poverty in Fiji written by University of the South Pacific (USP) academic, Professor Wadan Narsey
USP vice Chancellor Professor Rajesh Chandra launched the book today at the USP.
Speaking at the launching Dr Narsey highlighted that knowing the difference between “incidence of poverty” and “poverty gap” was vital for understanding Fiji’s lack of genuine political dialogue on poverty.
He said Indo-Fijian political parties would like to use this result while major Fijian political parties chose to ignore it.
“But what share of poverty alleviation resources should the two groups get, based on ‘need’ alone,” he asked.
“For example, what would each group get if taxpayers were to give each “poor” household just enough in cash or subsidised services to just bring them up the poverty line values?
“That depends not just how far the households are below the poverty line but also how many people there are below the poverty line.
“It depends very strongly on the number of people who are poor.”
Dr Narsey also noted in his book that even though a higher percentage of Indo-Fijians were poor (compared to Fijians) population wise, there were more poor Fijians than poor Indo-Fijians.
So the ethnic share of the ‘poverty gap’ using differentiated basic need poverty line (BNPL) values is as follows: Fijians 49 per cent and Indo Fijians 47 per cent.
According to Dr Narsey, “Indo-Fijian political parties ignore this result, while Fijian political parties use it.”
Dr Narsey said that an affirmative action policy on poverty alleviation based purely on need (not on ethnicity) would still give a higher proportion of the resources to indigenous Fijians.
This was noted in the 2007 census results that showed Fijians getting 57 per cent share (and share will keep on rising over time) while Indo Fijians got 37 per cent (share is falling with emigration and lower birth rate).
“Why are our political leaders blind to the poverty needs of different races,” he asked.
The professor also highlighted other points outlined in his book.
For instance, he pointed out that in Chapter 8 of the book with its profile of “the conditions of life”, of the poorest 30 per cent shows clearly that Rural Fijians are far more deprived than other groups in terms of housing, transport, electricity, water, toilets, cooking apparatus, television/videos and telecommunications.
“Everything except food,” Dr Narsey added.
On the other hand, when it comes to access to land, which is most fundamental in reflecting “capacity of rural households” to ensure food security and income earning capacity, rural Indo-Fijians are far more deprived and that is even indicated by the incomes data.
However, Dr Narsey pointed out that many Fijians who allegedly “own mataqali land”, cannot get security of tenure even on “their own” land and are in no position to invest in their agricultural capacity.
He said a lot of Fijians now prefer to buy freehold land as well.
Dr Narsey acknowledged the Fiji Islands Bureau of Statistics (among others) for allowing the full use of the results of the National Household and Income Expenditure Survey (HIES) of 2002-’03 as well as other statistics for his book.
Fijilive
|
|
Posted Comments
|
Posted
By: sereyawa
Posted On:
Jul 21 2008 19:16:24
Comment:
This is something that was known for sometime now - if you ever went and lived amongst our rural population. It great that Dr Narsey has brought this out so people can know & must know the truth instead of using statistics to meet their own private agendas as has been the case for so long. Here is a realistic look at the facts, not some interpretation.
|
Posted
By: Ula Nejad
Posted On:
Jul 21 2008 19:21:07
Comment:
I'm glad this came out because of the work of Social Welfare. Though bits and pieces of information was thrown around the media, I for one would have liked if someone had truthfully reported poverty between the Fijians and Indians. While he has described how the distribution of material wealth is lopsided says much about the distribution of wealth and who is responsible. So this is why I think welfare reform was needed and a timeline placed at the minimum of 5 years whereby recipients were required to work and offered govt training. Domestic violence victims should be included in this programme. Protocols in place. This should be applied to all races on the basis of need as Dr Narsey stated. This is where the aid money should be going. As for Fijians, there really should be no excuse as they are landowners but this is where they are going to need the help of the natives who have acquired the skills and knowledge to improve thier ability to play in a level playing field with others. It's a 21st century challenge and I have no doubt at all that the natives are now ready to take the reigns of their own destiny with the help of others and with authority. The only problem is which of the native. So far a few have done very well for themselves. I would like to see those who have struggled to get creative and get a piece of the pie too.
|
Posted
By: rkm
Posted On:
Jul 21 2008 21:53:02
Comment:
The figures show that this is true that a lot of the Indo Fijian population is below the poverty line and who is to be be blamed here. I think that the previous Governments are responsible for this who has not taken into account or has done nothing to improve the standards of these people and instead pushed them towards poverty by not listening to their grievances and also a contributing factor was land lease problems which forced people into poverty. An average farmer in 1999 had a farm to support his family but after his lease expired he had to move out to urban centres and settle in squatter settlements. The ministers are travelling by Queens Highway every day and the sight is clear to them at Korovuto, Nawaka and areas around Nadi. Same applies to other places in Fiji. All along the Government has done nothing. I agree with lawyer Isireli Fa's comments that all political leaders in the IG and the previous governments should not be allowed to contest the coming elections. The younger generation should be given tickets to contest the coming election.
|
Posted
By: Viren Singh
Posted On:
Jul 21 2008 23:47:26
Comment:
I escaped that poverty stricken country, my mother land, in 1975,where I lived with my families, next to my native brothers and sisters who were all in the same boat as us. We were deprived of every things by the Government and the so-called Indian political parties. So what's the big deal now?
|
Posted
By: moggyman
Posted On:
Jul 22 2008 03:35:55
Comment:
Yes the finding is good but there is no immediate solution. The world over, there is discrimination and political parties in power do intimidate voters who are gullible and are forced to vote for an outspoken leader. As for now the Indo-Fijians are contemplating emigration as a solution out of this mess. Poor and deprived people are always there in society. The total base line of a deprived community is to look out for help, whereas in LQ's regime the Fijians were allocated to receive benefits to get them out of their dilemma. The Indians are poor because of location and rural economic deprivation. Development has always been slow in these communities where Indians were in the majority. Fijians find a way out as in the last 40 years there was always a majority Fijian Government in power. It's a fact of life. Though despite the deprivation and support from the authorities the Indians will survive.
|
Posted
By: Harryk
Posted On:
Jul 22 2008 05:03:52
Comment:
Hasn't this been what it's all about since 1987? Indo-Fijians being harassed and discriminated against for 21 years. All the home invasions and robberies targeting Indo-Fijians while the govt and police cast a blind eye. Indo-Fijians have been leaving in droves since '87 and who can blame them?
|
Posted
By: Naren
Posted On:
Jul 22 2008 06:13:22
Comment:
With 1/3 of the Indo-Fijian population struggling to put food on the table, never-ending coups that seem to only help natives and foreign investors, and over 100 years in Fiji, we should demand our own place in Fiji, with institutions and leaders who have to answer to us.
|
Posted
By: abdul
Posted On:
Jul 22 2008 08:31:22
Comment:
What are you talking about Dr Narsey? This country Fiji is itself classed as a poverty derived society. We take aid from developed countries as we are beggars and the rule of jungle applies here if somebody is disgruntled with the govt he does a coup and becomes a statesman.
|
Posted
By: Steven Hines
Posted On:
Jul 22 2008 08:33:03
Comment:
A very sad reality. While the so called 'leaders' have been promoting "ethno-nationalism', one in three lives in ragged poverty. It is a shame on virtually all who have ruled for the last 20 or so years. This includes the politicians, the managers, the chiefs and the landlords. Shame on you!
|
|
|
Story Tools
|
| |
Fijilive - Local News Headlines
|
| |
Most Popular Stories
|
|
|